Call us: (08) 6336 7575 - Email: info@lawdirect.com.au

Why Choose Us?

Choosing a lawyer is not an easy task. We take a personal interest in our clients and their well being.

  • We aim to provide high quality legal services at a fair price. 
  • We listen to the outcome our clients wish to achieve and act accordingly.
  • Most of our business comes from referrals so client satisfaction is paramount.

Recent News

Disciplinary hearings

03/05/2015 / 0 Comments

Statutory Demand

03/04/2015 / 0 Comments

Autonomous Sanctions

02/26/2015 / 0 Comments

 

  • Signing a contract Commercial agreements - Commercial documents We can provide a wide range of commercial documents to cover a variety of business situations. Some of the documents we provide are listed here. Please feel free to contact us to discuss your requirements. Agency agreement Agreement to provide consulting services Agreement for sale of shares Confidentiality… read more →
  • Go to court Litigation - Litigation Litigation can be time consuming and expensive, often developing a life of its own with evidence snowballing and costs spiraling. You can rely on us to fight your corner in an intelligent, focused and cost-effective manner that does not waste time or money. Many disputes can be resolved without the… read more →
  • Make a will | Estate planing | Trusts | Enduring power of attorney EPA |Enduring Power of Guardianship EPG Estate planning - What is a Will? A Will is a declaration of how a testator wishes his or her property to be disposed of following his or her death.  Certain requirements must be met for it to be deemed valid. A valid Will Some of the requirements for a Will to be deemed… read more →
  • Find a solution | Get some legal advice Get legal advice - Legal Advice It is better to plan and prepare, than to deal with the unexpected. You may be facing a new situation and you feel having a legal view will help you to make your decision. There are many ways to deal with issues that you may not be aware… read more →

 


What we do

Our practice areas include commercial law, drafting agreements such as software licences, leases, shareholder agreements, sale of share agreements, commercial and general litigation…


IT Industry

We can provide a wide range of services to the IT industry, including drafting contracts, software licences and technical litigation.

Take a Tour →


Dispute resolution

We work with our clients to try to obtain a satisfactory outcome in all circumstances. Often disputes can be settle without going to court which reduces the costs to the parties.

Take a Tour →

High Court summaries

Today the High Court granted special leave to appeal, and allowed an appeal, from a decision of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia, which had held that its supervisory jurisdiction did not extend to judicial review of determinations of the Industrial Relations Commission of South Australia ("the Commission") that the Commission lacked jurisdiction.
Wed, Jul 11, 2012, Continue reading at the source
Today the High Court by majority dismissed an appeal by Trent Nathan King against two convictions under s 318(1) of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (“the Act”) for “culpable driving causing death”. The Court held that there was no miscarriage of justice in the way in which alternative verdicts for the lesser offence of “dangerous driving causing death” under s 319(1) of the Act were left to the trial jury.
Wed, Jun 20, 2012, Continue reading at the source
Today the High Court, by majority, held that a funding agreement between the Commonwealth of Australia and Scripture Union Queensland ("SUQ") for the provision of chaplaincy services at a State school in Queensland ("the Funding Agreement") is invalid. A majority of the Court also held that payments made by the Commonwealth to SUQ under the Funding Agreement were not supported by s 61 of the Constitution.
Wed, Jun 20, 2012, Continue reading at the source
On 20 April 2012, the High Court allowed an appeal by Kinza Clodumar from the Supreme Court of Nauru. A majority of the High Court held that, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Nauru, the High Court may receive evidence that was not before the Supreme Court, where that evidence was not discoverable by the exercise of reasonable diligence on the part of the party seeking now to adduce the evidence. Today, the High Court published its reasons for allowing the appeal.
Wed, Jun 20, 2012, Continue reading at the source
Today the High Court by majority dismissed an appeal from the Full Court of the Supreme Court of South Australia, which had held that a husband could be guilty of rape of his wife in 1963.
Wed, May 30, 2012, Continue reading at the source

Supreme Court of WA Judgments

Delivered 23/09/2016
Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Continue reading at the source
Delivered 02/09/2016
Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Continue reading at the source
Delivered 23/09/2016
Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Continue reading at the source
Delivered 22/09/2016
Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Continue reading at the source
Delivered 23/09/2016
Fri, Sep 23, 2016, Continue reading at the source
Back to Top